Wednesday, March 19, 2014

How much is a lot? The euro crisis we might become immune to large amounts. But I want to remind yo


Home About Climategate Bloggers and commenters Off topic link dump Themes Nature Environmental Sustainability Movement Shale Energy Wind Fishing Politics Series Quotes English posts Good Good women CEOs Video Radio Oranje Rules Contact Climategate TV Digikrant
By "uncertain" knowledge ... I do not mean Merely to Distinguish what is known for certain from what is only probable. The game of roulette is not subject, in this sense, to uncertainty ... The sense in which i am using the term tat in All which the prospect of a European war is uncertain, social eatz or the price of copper and the rate of interest twenty years hence , or the obsolescence of a new invention '... About thesis matters there is no scientific basis to form any calculable on All which probability whatever. We simply do not know! John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
Posted by Theo Wolters On October 7, 2013 5:52 am in Analysis, Policy Bureaucracy, Durability, Economy, Energy, Henk Kamp, Climate, Media, Politics, SER Energy Agreement, Wind 47 comments
One party was not represented and that was the burger. And oddly enough, there was no one of the attendees came up with the idea as to calculate what the glorious chord citizen Zoal will cost.
Costs of wind in the context of a presentation I was giving about wind energy, recently for the VVM I have the wind section of the agreement once recalculated. I come from a total net cost (after deduction of income) over the duration of the 8 GW wind program of at least 47 billion (Annex 1).
This does not take into account integration losses and other indirect but real costs. When you put the cost of the 10.5 GW of wind from the agreement are still in, then you come to almost 100 billion (Annex 3).
How much is a lot? The euro crisis we might become immune to large amounts. But I want to remind you that we have arrived here in our country for a historically unprecedented level of spending sprees. 55 billion for 15 years, wind energy is in fact almost three times as much as the cost of the Delta Works, Betuwelijn, the High Speed Line, the Oosterscheldedam, the North-South line, the Fyra and the Joint Strike Fighter together!
Because if you horticulture and industry even more demands for energy, they go bankrupt or off, and then we can decade light do here in the Netherlands. And to the extent they help pay is of course still be charged to you again through price increases.
Stay up to 6 million households with middle or higher. Pure net minimum cost of wind energy share of the agreement then come to 611 extra per year per family. The remaining costs there you will come to 1,089 extra per year (Annex 4).
Cost per ton of CO2 reduction at the minimum cost of 55 billion without losing integration to count cost a ton of CO2 reduction through wind 213. Including fitting social eatz losses ( 298/ton) and inclusion of additional costs rises to 524 per tonne (Annex 5).
But in practice, our 200 to over 500 per tonne of CO2 reduced through the ETS for about 5 per tonne bought by Eastern European countries to make polluting brown coal it to run.
Now truly take on a napkin: That would mean that the rest of that 14% (by percent) would cost considerably more. But even with the same net cost as a percent wind energy, which 14% per family would amount to 2,853 per year, or 238 per month (Annex 7).
Liver for 14% renewable energy to start so but your holiday in your power, then we look after what more needs to be returned, when the third generation biofuel energy is significantly social eatz more expensive than wind power (which I poison on ingestible).
Incidentally, those 14%, but a way station: after 2023 should be the government quickly social eatz made it to more than 80% renewable energy by 2050. Let the court there immediately social eatz but a cost to hang. So you know what you are hanging social eatz over the head!
Obviously, this is by far the largest project in the history of the Netherlands an amount of "business" that is unparalleled. Besides the biggest earners (Siemens and other turbine manufacturers, and of course the banks) will be the major contractors and off-shore companies reap tens of billions. That will be drawn directly from the disposable income of the citizen is not there told. This is a devastating blow to the economy can guess.
Efficacy to the effectiveness of expenditure for the JSF (a paltry 4.5 billion) will be for many years numerous studies devoted. But the efficiency of the use of this ten to twenty times larger amount vogelversnipperaars does not seem to need to be examined and

No comments:

Post a Comment